Should Education be for the Market or for the sake of
Education?
Correct me if I am wrong but education worries me. We seem
to churning out stuff that was taught 20 years ago and so as to speak flogging
dead horses. If the purpose of education is philosophical - then we should
debate whether what is being applied is appropriate and in what contexts - we
should challenge theory - we should encourage multiplicity of viewpoints and we
should embed contexts other than that which originates from the west!
If the purpose of education is application - when then we
need to know how it is applied and why and when does it work and when it doesn’t!
You need the involvement of industry, governments and NGOs at the curriculum
stage and not when the finished product is ready (meaning the student). By then
the damage is done.
We seem to be spending significant amounts on corporate re-training
but for me the scarier thought is the number of students taking "business" at school and
for bachelors with no work experience or insights! How will they understand
what we teach? They can memorize but that does not mean they can relate to its
significance. Is it too early? Should we instead encourage the spirit of entrepreneurship?
Should business be a top up degree to a specialization? What role are
accreditations playing to perpetuate the damage?
No comments:
Post a Comment