Friday, November 15, 2013

The dark side of being good - CSR, Social responsibility and other things

As the world recovers from yet another crisis with typhoon Haiyan - we see humans struggle to do good. Don't get me wrong - we all have great intensions but they seem to be spurred by the 4th Estate and the media coverage. As individuals, what gets our attention is what is staring us in the face. How do we sustain the causes that are unfinished? The UN keeps on appealing for more aid and there does not seem enough to go on. A few years back a contract UN worker lamented how organisations normally approached the UN at the end of the annual year to implement their excess budget so they could declare it in their annual reports. The UN worker also highlighted that the organisations concerned never wanted to  get involved in feasibility of the project or the monitoring of their projects. So tell me this, as shareholders - how engaged was the organisation in CSR?

A few months ago we were discussing the Dove - real beauty campaign. I love the campaign as it addressees a need - that of the dwindling teenage girl self-esteem but my astute student asked me - "How can one company ask you if you are fair enough (Fair and Lovely) and the next minute talk about real beauty?" And that is an excellent point.  Very few members of my class had caught on it was the same company that sold both products. So where does CSR begin and end?

In January, earlier this year, at the AIBMENA Cairo Conference I was asked whether I thought the  west was way ahead of this region in social responsibility but on debating this topic I brought up two points:  (1) the law was more strict in the west and this gave more guidelines to companies operating in the west - did this mean people were doing it because they were  good or because the consequences of non-compliance were avoidable? (2) in emerging markets and especially in MENA - the concept of zakat, often did not allow more conscientious Muslims to declare their good works. Did that mean it did not qualify as CSR if it was not audited?

The bad side of being good is now every organisation wants to audit it in PR terms (col.cm.) or even worse through reports. I have nothing against reports - but the report is a tool - not the ultimate goal! The good side of the new movement to auditing is that we are helping organisations realise they should have a moral conscience. We need to take it a step further. I firmly believe before we step outside our organisation, we need to look internally and if the culture of doing good is rampant, it will spread outside and be genuine. 

Tuesday, June 4, 2013


Should Education be for the Market or for the sake of Education?
Correct me if I am wrong but education worries me. We seem to churning out stuff that was taught 20 years ago and so as to speak flogging dead horses. If the purpose of education is philosophical - then we should debate whether what is being applied is appropriate and in what contexts - we should challenge theory - we should encourage multiplicity of viewpoints and we should embed contexts other than that which originates from the west!

If the purpose of education is application - when then we need to know how it is applied and why and when does it work and when it doesn’t! You need the involvement of industry, governments and NGOs at the curriculum stage and not when the finished product is ready (meaning the student). By then the damage is done.

We seem to be spending significant amounts on corporate re-training but for me the scarier thought  is the number of students taking "business" at school and for bachelors with no work experience or insights! How will they understand what we teach? They can memorize but that does not mean they can relate to its significance. Is it too early? Should we instead encourage the spirit of entrepreneurship? Should business be a top up degree to a specialization? What role are accreditations playing to perpetuate the damage?